Resaldis
Δραστήριο μέλος
Ο Resaldis αυτή τη στιγμή δεν είναι συνδεδεμένος. Είναι Απόφοιτος λυκείου και μας γράφει απο Αθήνα (Αττική). Έχει γράψει 784 μηνύματα.
25-09-19
17:37
Προσδιόρισε τι εννοείς όταν λες "γνωστικά οφέλη". Γιατί, νομίζω, δύσκολα μπορεί να αρνηθεί κανείς ὀτι το σκάκι αφενώς καλλιεργεί την πειθαρχία και τη μεθοδολογία στη σκέψη, αφετέρου αποτελεί μια ευχάριστη τουλάχιστον πνευματική άσκηση.
Σχετικά με τον εθισμό, ο καθένας μας μπορεί, με λίγη καλή θέση, να εθιστεί στα πάντα, είτε πρόκειται για σκάκι, είτε για τάβλι, εἰτε για βιβλία, είτε για φιλοσοφία, είτε για άθληση, είτε για μουσική, είτε για οτιδήποτε. Ο κίνδυνος εθισμού, ωστόσο, σε καμία περίπτωση δεν νομιμοποιεί την αποχή από τη συγκεκριμένη δραστηριότητα.
Στην πρώτη περίπτωση, η συγκροτημένη σκέψη αφορά τη σκακιέρα τουλάχιστον. Γιατί να θεωρούμε ότι μεταφέρεται οπωσδήποτε κι εκτός αυτής; Όσο για τους εθισμούς της συμπεριφοράς, μήπως τους έχεις υπεργενικεύσει; Και γιατί να θεωρούμε ότι ο κίνδυνος εθισμού στο σκάκι είναι χαμηλός;
Resaldis
Δραστήριο μέλος
Ο Resaldis αυτή τη στιγμή δεν είναι συνδεδεμένος. Είναι Απόφοιτος λυκείου και μας γράφει απο Αθήνα (Αττική). Έχει γράψει 784 μηνύματα.
25-09-19
14:29
Ενώ τα γνωστικά οφέλη του σκακιού είναι ατεκμηρίωτα, ο κίνδυνος «εθισμού» σε αυτό είναι πραγματικός.
Λόγου χάρη, ο διάσημος οικονομολόγος Kenneth Rogoff χρειάστηκε ν' «απεξαρτηθεί» από το σκάκι ώστε να διακριθεί στα οικονομικά.
Απεναντίας, ο νεότερος συνάδελφός του David Smerdon συνδυάζει αρμονικά το σκάκι με την έρευνα.
Λόγου χάρη, ο διάσημος οικονομολόγος Kenneth Rogoff χρειάστηκε ν' «απεξαρτηθεί» από το σκάκι ώστε να διακριθεί στα οικονομικά.
Απεναντίας, ο νεότερος συνάδελφός του David Smerdon συνδυάζει αρμονικά το σκάκι με την έρευνα.
Resaldis
Δραστήριο μέλος
Ο Resaldis αυτή τη στιγμή δεν είναι συνδεδεμένος. Είναι Απόφοιτος λυκείου και μας γράφει απο Αθήνα (Αττική). Έχει γράψει 784 μηνύματα.
24-09-19
17:24
Chess has acquired a high reputation as being a means to discipline the mind, because it requires a strong memory and peculiar powers of combination. It is also generally believed that skill in playing it affords evidence of a superior intellect. These opinions, we believe, are exceedingly erroneous. Napoleon the Great, who had a great passion for playing chess, was often beaten by a rough grocer in St. Helena. Neither Shakespeare, Milton, Newton, nor any of the great ones of the earth, acquired proficiency in chess-playing. Those who become the most renowned players seem to have been endowed with a peculiar intuitive faculty for making the right moves, while at the same time they seem to have possessed very ordinary faculties for other purposes. A game of chess does not add a single new fact to the mind; it does not excite a single beautiful thought; nor does it serve a single purpose for polishing and improving the nobler faculties.
Persons engaged in sedentary occupations should never practice this cheerless game; they require outdoor exercises for recreation — not the sort of mental gladiatorship. Those who are engaged in mental pursuits should avoid a chess board as they would an adder’s nest, because chess misdirects and exhausts their intellectual energies. Rather let them dance, sing, play ball, perform gymnastics, roam in the woods or by the seashore, than play chess. It is a game which no man who depends on his trade, business or profession can afford to waste time in practicing; it is an amusement — and a very unprofitable one — which the independently wealthy alone can afford time to lose in its pursuit. As there can be no great proficiency in this intricate game without long-continued practice, which demands a great deal of time, no young man who designs to be useful in the world can prosecute it without danger to his best interests. A young gentleman of our acquaintance, who had become a somewhat skillful player, recently pushed the chess board from him at the end of the game, declaring, “I have wasted too much time upon it already; I cannot afford to do this any longer; this is my last game.” We recommend his resolution to all those who have been foolishly led away by the present chess excitement, as skill in this game is neither a useful nor graceful accomplishment.
Πηγή: Scientific American, 2 Ιουλίου 1859
Persons engaged in sedentary occupations should never practice this cheerless game; they require outdoor exercises for recreation — not the sort of mental gladiatorship. Those who are engaged in mental pursuits should avoid a chess board as they would an adder’s nest, because chess misdirects and exhausts their intellectual energies. Rather let them dance, sing, play ball, perform gymnastics, roam in the woods or by the seashore, than play chess. It is a game which no man who depends on his trade, business or profession can afford to waste time in practicing; it is an amusement — and a very unprofitable one — which the independently wealthy alone can afford time to lose in its pursuit. As there can be no great proficiency in this intricate game without long-continued practice, which demands a great deal of time, no young man who designs to be useful in the world can prosecute it without danger to his best interests. A young gentleman of our acquaintance, who had become a somewhat skillful player, recently pushed the chess board from him at the end of the game, declaring, “I have wasted too much time upon it already; I cannot afford to do this any longer; this is my last game.” We recommend his resolution to all those who have been foolishly led away by the present chess excitement, as skill in this game is neither a useful nor graceful accomplishment.
Πηγή: Scientific American, 2 Ιουλίου 1859